1636 CE–1637 CE
Dutch tulip contracts and price collapse
Money, banking & finance · Mercados y riesgo
The boom and collapse of 1636–1637 involved private forward contracts on bulbs, often without immediate delivery or margin requirements. Academic evidence debates scope, prices, and effects; this entry records a localised episode of contractual risk and renegotiation, not the myth of an instant ruin of the whole Dutch economy or one lesson about “irrationality.”
Precision, calendar, and review
- Start
- year · no uncertainty qualifier in this record
- End
- year · no uncertainty qualifier in this record
- Calendar and convention
- Historical-era years; the source calendar is not identified. No conversion of days is assumed.
- Year zero
- The scale goes from 1 BCE to 1 CE without year zero. Changing era names changes labels only.
- Documentary review
- Date not recorded
Reading the date: duration of a process.
Sources
- www.cambridge.org (opens in a new tab)
Source provenance and scope
- Publication date
- 2017-08
- What this date describes
- The cited source or edition; it may postdate the historical event.
- Bibliographic date checked
- 2026-09-23
- Date evidence
- Declared in the cited source’s publisher metadata.
The correspondence between this reference and individual claims has not yet been itemized.
This record is an editorial synthesis. Consult the sources to check claims and their limits. Chronological relationships alone do not establish causation.