Chinese traditions

An editorial selection for comparing processes, events, and lives. The interval and counts describe selected records, not the historical boundaries or importance of the subject.

Canonical records
64
Events
35
People
2
Processes and periods
27
Compare in the atlasSelection criteria and limits

Topics represented

Religion (61) · Chinese traditions (61) · Daoist traditions (19) · Confucian traditions (11) · Temples and heritage (9) · Popular religion (8) · Religion and the state (8) · Texts and transmission (6) · Religious interactions (5) · Ritual and the state (5) · Education and examinations (4) · Law & constitutions (3)

View distribution by region and period
Canonical records by regional label and start date. These are numerical analysis bins, not universal historical periods. A multi-region record appears in multiple rows; do not add rows as a unique-record total.
RegionBefore 3000 BCE3000–1 BCE1–14991500–17991800–18991900–1999Since 2000
Africa0000000
Americas0000100
Asia0132233129
Europe0000000
Oceania0000000
Global / no specific region0000205

Records and sources

Ordered by start date. Long lives and processes may begin before the period you want to study.

  1. 2020

    Ong Chun/Wangchuan inscribed

    UNESCO inscribed a ceremony shared by China and Malaysia, connecting Ong Yah worship, memories of seafaring ancestors and Minnan communities in Xiamen, Quanzhou and Melaka.

  2. 2024

    Qiang New Year on Representative List

    The Qiang element from Sichuan moved from the Urgent Safeguarding List to the Representative List. Its recognition concerns a specific non-Han tradition with its own community history.

  3. 2024

    Spring Festival inscribed

    UNESCO inscribed traditional New Year practices including family reunions and offerings to heaven, earth and ancestors. Recognition of continuity and transmission does not imply identical practices in every community.

  4. 2025

    ICH periodic reporting

    UNESCO records the state report submitted in 2024 and examined in 2025. It documents contemporary heritage administration rather than directly measuring religiosity or community vitality.